I am not part of a book discussion
group. I was part of one 23 years ago,
but we have moved several times and have not connected with another one since. I was very glad to be a part of one on
February 16, 2015.
The
event on February 16 is called a Book Talkers.
The Book Talkers occurs at the same library branch each month on the
third Monday. The Monday shifts to a
different week if it falls on a holiday that compels the library to close. The subject of Book Talkers is not announced
on the web or ahead of time. However, I
learned during the Book Talkers meeting that last month’s Talk had to do with
mysteries. The one I participated in had
a working title of “Novels Coming Soon to a Theater Near You.” The books
discussed were all books that had been made into movies or were movies in
production. There was no expectation
that anyone would read any of the books before coming to Book Talkers.
The Book Talkers met near the
fireplace in the library, which, I am pleased to report, was burning. February 16 in South Bend reached a high of
12. The fireplace created a cozy
atmosphere. Popcorn, water, and lemonade
were provided for our enjoyment. We sat
on comfortable couches and chairs in a wide circle.
The librarian, Mary Ann Moore, gave
us a sheet of paper that told us the name of the theme for the discussion and
listed the following books that would be addressed:
The Good Lord Bird, James McBride
Me Before You, Jojo Moyes
Before I Go to Sleep, S. J. Watson
Serena, Ron Nash
The Longest Ride, Nicholas Sparks
This is Where I Leave You, Jonathan Tropper
The Hundred-Foot Journey, Richard Marais
The
following books were listed under “Other Book-to-Movie Titles”:
Still Alice, Lisa Genova
Where the Rainbows End
(Love, Rosie), Cecelia
Ahern
Far from the Madding Crowd, Thomas Hardy
Paper Towns, John Green
A Walk in the Woods, Bill Bryson
We started on time. Mary Ann remained
seated and began with announcements about library program events that were
coming up in the next couple of weeks at the main branch as well as at her own
branch. She pointed out the free Bookpage monthly that is available at
the library branches. It is a resource
to learn about books that are coming out.
She also encouraged us to use the new digital magazine medium called
Flipster.
Mary Ann then proceeded with a brief
synopsis of the first seven books on the list above. The synopsis included genre, a summary of the
book, and appeal factors. Mary Ann
clearly had read the books that she was talking about. She had notes on the table before her but did
not refer to them. After her introduction to each book, she asked the 13 of us
if we had read the book. If someone had,
she asked if he or she would like to share his or her thoughts on the reading
experience. A number of people did. After the introduction of the book, Mary Ann often
offered her own like or dislike of the book. She also asked if anyone had seen
the movie that goes with the book. There
was often a brief conversation about whether the movie was better or more
engaging, and, whether or not it was faithful to the book.
We completed the list of books
before our allotted time ran out. She
tried to elicit more conversation by asking, “What have you been reading? What
is your favorite book to movie? What books did you like from last month’s
discussion on mystery books?” The
questions were answered and we had an interesting time of sharing.
I found that I enjoyed having the
majority of the conversation come from the librarian. The conversation felt structured and was
professionally facilitated. Erin Cataldi
stated in her post, “…if you are moderating, do not
lead with your opinion of the quality of the book.” (Welcome to Week Nine!)
Mary Ann did share her opinion but it was after others had ventured their own
opinions.
In Goldstein’s article Mary Beth
McKenna complained about publisher’s discussion questions. “Those
questions read like something you'd find in a college-level English lit class.
Book club discussions tend to focus on how the plot or characters relate to our
own lives or perspectives." Members of some other book clubs weigh in with
their thoughts about what works and what doesn't.” (32) The people who verbalized
their thoughts on the book in discussion made a number of “I” statements like,
“I like this or that” but did not relate the characters or situations described
in the books to their own lives.
However, I suspect that most of the people in the group do not know each
other very well, so this inhibits personal sharing.
The Book Talkers experience was
positive and the hour passed
very quickly.
Works Cited
Cataldi, Erin.
"Welcome to Week Nine!" Web log post. Readers' Advisory. Erin
Cataldi, 9 Mar. 2015. Web. 10 Mar. 2015.
Goldstein,
Bill. "Reads Well with Others." Publishers Weekly 252.21
(2005): 30-34. Academic Search
Premier. Web. 11 Mar. 2015.
What a wonderful environment with the fireplace burning, comfortable seating and refreshments! It's an interesting format with the discussion/overview of seven different books. It seems to really incorporate suggestive reading to the patron as well as provide a sounding board if they had already read the book. Sounds like fun!
ReplyDeleteYes! The atmosphere was just perfect.
ReplyDeleteThat is interesting that they discussed so many books. I guess they don't get into any deep discussion. It sounds like it is a good way to recommend books to each other more than to discuss the book. I have heard of groups having a discussion where everyone discusses their favorite book. It would be interesting to see if the same people attend every month or if it is just as they discuss something they enjoy.
ReplyDeleteThat is interesting that they discussed so many books. I guess they don't get into any deep discussion. It sounds like it is a good way to recommend books to each other more than to discuss the book. I have heard of groups having a discussion where everyone discusses their favorite book. It would be interesting to see if the same people attend every month or if it is just as they discuss something they enjoy.
ReplyDeleteWell, the one thing this kind of structure avoids is the dominating personality. It is up to the leader to present information. The group dynamics do not have an opportunity to get into full swing.
ReplyDelete